<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 400 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405072</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, in favor of the Appellant Company. The Tribunal found that in the absence of specific ingredients under Section 11AC and with no intent to evade duty, the penalty was not justified, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2021 09:14:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 400 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405072</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, in favor of the Appellant Company. The Tribunal found that in the absence of specific ingredients under Section 11AC and with no intent to evade duty, the penalty was not justified, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405072</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>