<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 397 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405069</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the addition of Rs. 14,50,000 under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act unjustified, as the dissolved firm was deemed capable of advancing the loan based on evidence. The procedural error of enhancing the addition without a show-cause notice was noted, leading to the deletion of the addition and allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 13:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 397 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405069</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the addition of Rs. 14,50,000 under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act unjustified, as the dissolved firm was deemed capable of advancing the loan based on evidence. The procedural error of enhancing the addition without a show-cause notice was noted, leading to the deletion of the addition and allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>