<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 394 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405066</link>
    <description>Sale consideration received on disposal of mortgaged property was treated as accruing to the assessee because the transaction was not shown to be a compelled sale subject to diversion of income by overriding title; the surplus was therefore taxable as long-term capital gain. A write-off arising from settlement of borrower dues in the ordinary course of financing activity and guarantee business was treated as a commercial loss and allowed as business loss. Part of the legal and professional expenses was disallowed because the assessee failed to furnish a satisfactory bifurcation or supporting evidence showing exclusive business use, and the estimated disallowance was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 394 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405066</link>
      <description>Sale consideration received on disposal of mortgaged property was treated as accruing to the assessee because the transaction was not shown to be a compelled sale subject to diversion of income by overriding title; the surplus was therefore taxable as long-term capital gain. A write-off arising from settlement of borrower dues in the ordinary course of financing activity and guarantee business was treated as a commercial loss and allowed as business loss. Part of the legal and professional expenses was disallowed because the assessee failed to furnish a satisfactory bifurcation or supporting evidence showing exclusive business use, and the estimated disallowance was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>