<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1478 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293948</link>
    <description>The court upheld the trial court&#039;s decision to reject the plaintiff&#039;s suit under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC, finding it barred by the Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Act, 1988. The plaintiff&#039;s claims of exclusive ownership were dismissed as the properties were deemed purchased in a benami transaction, violating the Act. The court affirmed the rejection of the plaint, concluding that the suit was not maintainable under the law. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the trial court&#039;s judgment and decree.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2021 09:13:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1478 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293948</link>
      <description>The court upheld the trial court&#039;s decision to reject the plaintiff&#039;s suit under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC, finding it barred by the Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Act, 1988. The plaintiff&#039;s claims of exclusive ownership were dismissed as the properties were deemed purchased in a benami transaction, violating the Act. The court affirmed the rejection of the plaint, concluding that the suit was not maintainable under the law. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the trial court&#039;s judgment and decree.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>