https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57101 Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions - Petitioner contends that the Petitioner as the head of a joint family representing him and his brothers are absolute owners of the suit properties.contention of the Petitioner that the Respondent No.1 was holding the property as a trustee, in fiduciary capacity, and the property held by him could not, therefore, be treated as Benami, in view of Section 4(3)(b) of the Benami Act - Petition dismissed - SC en-us Wed, 10 Mar 2021 13:22:39 +0530 Wed, 10 Mar 2021 13:22:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57101 Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions - Petitioner contends that the Petitioner as the head of a joint family representing him and his brothers are absolute owners of the suit properties.contention of the Petitioner that the Respondent No.1 was holding the property as a trustee, in fiduciary capacity, and the property held by him could not, therefore, be treated as Benami, in view of Section 4(3)(b) of the Benami Act - Petition dismissed - SC Highlights Direct Taxes Wed, 10 Mar 2021 13:22:39 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57101