<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (12) TMI 9 - ORISSA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24855</link>
    <description>Service of a demand notice is a precondition to recovery of income-tax arrears. Service under the applicable provisions requires proof of delivery to the assessee or a legally competent recipient, such as an authorised agent, manager, principal officer, or eligible adult family member. Postal acknowledgements that do not establish such delivery do not create a presumption of valid service. Consequently, recovery of the balance arrears could not proceed without proved service of demand notices. However, arrears admittedly payable for the relevant assessment years, as reduced through prior proceedings, remained recoverable from the decretal deposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:42:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63853" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (12) TMI 9 - ORISSA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24855</link>
      <description>Service of a demand notice is a precondition to recovery of income-tax arrears. Service under the applicable provisions requires proof of delivery to the assessee or a legally competent recipient, such as an authorised agent, manager, principal officer, or eligible adult family member. Postal acknowledgements that do not establish such delivery do not create a presumption of valid service. Consequently, recovery of the balance arrears could not proceed without proved service of demand notices. However, arrears admittedly payable for the relevant assessment years, as reduced through prior proceedings, remained recoverable from the decretal deposit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>