<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1948 (2) TMI 23 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293937</link>
    <description>Section 197 CrPC protection was treated as unavailable where the conduct complained of could not reasonably be described as an act done in discharge of official duty, since accepting a bribe falls outside that scope; the existing sanction was nevertheless regarded as sufficient for the altered charge structure. Writings of one accused were admissible against a co-accused under Section 10 of the Evidence Act only if there was an independent foundation for believing a conspiracy existed, and once that foundation disappeared the writings lost admissibility. Without that material, the conspiracy convictions under Section 120B read with Section 165 IPC could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 1948 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2021 10:17:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1948 (2) TMI 23 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293937</link>
      <description>Section 197 CrPC protection was treated as unavailable where the conduct complained of could not reasonably be described as an act done in discharge of official duty, since accepting a bribe falls outside that scope; the existing sanction was nevertheless regarded as sufficient for the altered charge structure. Writings of one accused were admissible against a co-accused under Section 10 of the Evidence Act only if there was an independent foundation for believing a conspiracy existed, and once that foundation disappeared the writings lost admissibility. Without that material, the conspiracy convictions under Section 120B read with Section 165 IPC could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 1948 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>