<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 357 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405029</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; orders refusing to condone a 21-day delay in filing appeals, deeming them not maintainable. The Tribunal emphasized the power to condone delays, maintainability of appeals, and interest claims on delayed refunds. It found the delay reasonable, remanding the matters to the Commissioner (Appeals) to decide on merit within one month, stressing the importance of considering reasons for delays and deciding cases on their merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2021 14:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 357 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405029</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; orders refusing to condone a 21-day delay in filing appeals, deeming them not maintainable. The Tribunal emphasized the power to condone delays, maintainability of appeals, and interest claims on delayed refunds. It found the delay reasonable, remanding the matters to the Commissioner (Appeals) to decide on merit within one month, stressing the importance of considering reasons for delays and deciding cases on their merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405029</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>