<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (8) TMI 95 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24850</link>
    <description>A reference under section 256(2) was sought on whether the Tribunal was justified in deleting capital gains from the assessee&#039;s total income. The High Court held that the proposed issue disclosed a referable question of law arising out of the Tribunal&#039;s order, making it fit for reference. The application was therefore allowed and the Tribunal was directed to state the case and refer the question to the Court for opinion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:13:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (8) TMI 95 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24850</link>
      <description>A reference under section 256(2) was sought on whether the Tribunal was justified in deleting capital gains from the assessee&#039;s total income. The High Court held that the proposed issue disclosed a referable question of law arising out of the Tribunal&#039;s order, making it fit for reference. The application was therefore allowed and the Tribunal was directed to state the case and refer the question to the Court for opinion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>