<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1590 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293927</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s orders. It found the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to make additions under Section 153A due to the absence of incriminating material. The Tribunal affirmed the purchases as genuine, allowed the deduction under Section 80-IA, and deemed no disallowance under Section 14A necessary. The decision was rooted in a comprehensive review of the evidence and established legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2021 08:28:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638478" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1590 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293927</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s orders. It found the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to make additions under Section 153A due to the absence of incriminating material. The Tribunal affirmed the purchases as genuine, allowed the deduction under Section 80-IA, and deemed no disallowance under Section 14A necessary. The decision was rooted in a comprehensive review of the evidence and established legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>