https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293936 An application under Order VII Rule 11 must be decided before the court proceeds with trial, because a challenge to maintainability goes to the plaint itself and cannot be deferred to final hearing or tested on defence material. On the facts, the election petition did not disclose any ground for rejection under Order VII Rule 11, so the rejection application was dismissed. The appellant was nevertheless granted limited time to file a written statement in the peculiar circumstances of the matter. en-us Mon, 04 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Mar 2021 08:28:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293936 An application under Order VII Rule 11 must be decided before the court proceeds with trial, because a challenge to maintainability goes to the plaint itself and cannot be deferred to final hearing or tested on defence material. On the facts, the election petition did not disclose any ground for rejection under Order VII Rule 11, so the rejection application was dismissed. The appellant was nevertheless granted limited time to file a written statement in the peculiar circumstances of the matter. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 04 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293936