<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessee&#039;s SEZ development approved u/s 80IAB; capital expenditure legitimacy upheld, deduction rights affirmed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57076</link>
    <description>Deduction u/s 80IAB - development of SEZ - BOA has granted approval to the assessee. This approval has not been cancelled or suspended. It was valid. The assessee has offered a piece of land at lease rent for a period of 99 years with development charges - The receipt has been shown as income - Sister concern has already applied to the BOA Before the 31st March for approval. - It could not be doubted by referring an aspect that capital expenditure shown and capitalized under the head work-in-progress was bogus. On the basis of such an observation, deduction otherwise admissible to the assessee cannot be denied. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 15:40:20 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 15:40:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessee&#039;s SEZ development approved u/s 80IAB; capital expenditure legitimacy upheld, deduction rights affirmed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57076</link>
      <description>Deduction u/s 80IAB - development of SEZ - BOA has granted approval to the assessee. This approval has not been cancelled or suspended. It was valid. The assessee has offered a piece of land at lease rent for a period of 99 years with development charges - The receipt has been shown as income - Sister concern has already applied to the BOA Before the 31st March for approval. - It could not be doubted by referring an aspect that capital expenditure shown and capitalized under the head work-in-progress was bogus. On the basis of such an observation, deduction otherwise admissible to the assessee cannot be denied. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 15:40:20 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57076</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>