<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (8) TMI 94 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24846</link>
    <description>A genuine antecedent matrimonial arrangement can constitute adequate consideration when property is settled in performance of that obligation, rather than as a gratuitous transfer. The article states that contemporaneous letters and uncontroverted mediator affidavits supported the existence of a pre-nuptial agreement under which the assessee undertook to settle property for the children of the second marriage, and that this obligation was natural and probable on the facts. It further explains that adequate consideration must be measurable in money and more than mere love and affection, so a transfer made to discharge the prior promise is supported by adequate consideration and does not attract the clubbing rule in section 64 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:02:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63844" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (8) TMI 94 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24846</link>
      <description>A genuine antecedent matrimonial arrangement can constitute adequate consideration when property is settled in performance of that obligation, rather than as a gratuitous transfer. The article states that contemporaneous letters and uncontroverted mediator affidavits supported the existence of a pre-nuptial agreement under which the assessee undertook to settle property for the children of the second marriage, and that this obligation was natural and probable on the facts. It further explains that adequate consideration must be measurable in money and more than mere love and affection, so a transfer made to discharge the prior promise is supported by adequate consideration and does not attract the clubbing rule in section 64 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24846</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>