https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405007 The High Court allowed the petitioner to raise issues on merits, including jurisdiction, before the National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAPA) regarding the non-passing of GST rate reduction benefits. The Court directed the respondent to provide the investigation report to the petitioner, who could file objections within two weeks. NAPA was instructed to grant a personal hearing to the petitioner's representative, issue a speaking order, and provide a copy to the petitioner. The petitioner could seek legal remedies if NAPA's decision was adverse, and any unfavorable order would not be enforced for three weeks from service. en-us Tue, 02 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Mar 2025 13:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405007 The High Court allowed the petitioner to raise issues on merits, including jurisdiction, before the National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAPA) regarding the non-passing of GST rate reduction benefits. The Court directed the respondent to provide the investigation report to the petitioner, who could file objections within two weeks. NAPA was instructed to grant a personal hearing to the petitioner's representative, issue a speaking order, and provide a copy to the petitioner. The petitioner could seek legal remedies if NAPA's decision was adverse, and any unfavorable order would not be enforced for three weeks from service. Case-Laws GST Tue, 02 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405007