<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 332 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405004</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for AY 2011-2012 and the subsequent order due to insufficient evidence of administrative approval. The petitioner successfully challenged the notice by providing evidence of filing the Income Tax Return for the relevant year, which the Revenue acknowledged. The Court emphasized the importance of clear administrative approval records and ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the Revenue to cover costs and disposing of the writ petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2021 15:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 332 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405004</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for AY 2011-2012 and the subsequent order due to insufficient evidence of administrative approval. The petitioner successfully challenged the notice by providing evidence of filing the Income Tax Return for the relevant year, which the Revenue acknowledged. The Court emphasized the importance of clear administrative approval records and ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the Revenue to cover costs and disposing of the writ petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>