<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 316 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404988</link>
    <description>The case involved disputes regarding the treatment of land sale as agricultural income, addition of unexplained investment, treatment of agricultural income, addition of unexplained deposits, and compliance with Rule 46A of I.T. Rules. The ITAT set aside the decisions of the CIT (A) in all issues due to failure to verify evidence and violation of Rule 46A, remanding the case to the AO for a fresh assessment in each instance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 15:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 316 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404988</link>
      <description>The case involved disputes regarding the treatment of land sale as agricultural income, addition of unexplained investment, treatment of agricultural income, addition of unexplained deposits, and compliance with Rule 46A of I.T. Rules. The ITAT set aside the decisions of the CIT (A) in all issues due to failure to verify evidence and violation of Rule 46A, remanding the case to the AO for a fresh assessment in each instance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>