https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404980 The Court dismissed the writ petitions filed by Companies seeking permission to file e-form ACTIVE, INC-22A without appointing a whole-time Company Secretary. While acknowledging the provisional permission granted for filing the form, the Court emphasized the non-compliance with Section 203 of the Companies Act and allowed the respondents to take legal action against the petitioners for violating the provision. The judgment highlighted the penalties for non-compliance with Section 203 and clarified that the interim relief did not determine the legality of the relevant rules, leaving room for further legal action. en-us Tue, 02 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Mar 2021 08:48:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404980 The Court dismissed the writ petitions filed by Companies seeking permission to file e-form ACTIVE, INC-22A without appointing a whole-time Company Secretary. While acknowledging the provisional permission granted for filing the form, the Court emphasized the non-compliance with Section 203 of the Companies Act and allowed the respondents to take legal action against the petitioners for violating the provision. The judgment highlighted the penalties for non-compliance with Section 203 and clarified that the interim relief did not determine the legality of the relevant rules, leaving room for further legal action. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 02 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404980