<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 303 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404975</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the COC&#039;s commercial wisdom and the approved Resolution Plan. It held that considerations of priority and value of security interest fall within the COC&#039;s domain and are not subject to judicial review under Section 61(3) of the I&amp;B Code, provided similarly situated creditors receive fair treatment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 11:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638374" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 303 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404975</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the COC&#039;s commercial wisdom and the approved Resolution Plan. It held that considerations of priority and value of security interest fall within the COC&#039;s domain and are not subject to judicial review under Section 61(3) of the I&amp;B Code, provided similarly situated creditors receive fair treatment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404975</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>