<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 298 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404970</link>
    <description>The tribunal found that the corporate debtor&#039;s failure to pay interest and instalments periodically constituted a default under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Despite the debtor&#039;s argument that the cheque was for security, the tribunal held that its dishonour indicated a payment default. Consequently, the tribunal admitted the corporate debtor to the corporate insolvency resolution process, declaring a moratorium and appointing an interim resolution professional to manage the company&#039;s operations and assets. The financial creditor was directed to cover the IRP&#039;s expenses, with additional funds as necessary, and the decision was communicated to all relevant parties, finalizing the debtor&#039;s admission to the resolution process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 08:47:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 298 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404970</link>
      <description>The tribunal found that the corporate debtor&#039;s failure to pay interest and instalments periodically constituted a default under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Despite the debtor&#039;s argument that the cheque was for security, the tribunal held that its dishonour indicated a payment default. Consequently, the tribunal admitted the corporate debtor to the corporate insolvency resolution process, declaring a moratorium and appointing an interim resolution professional to manage the company&#039;s operations and assets. The financial creditor was directed to cover the IRP&#039;s expenses, with additional funds as necessary, and the decision was communicated to all relevant parties, finalizing the debtor&#039;s admission to the resolution process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>