https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404958 In a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, revisional interference is limited to jurisdictional error, perversity, gross illegality, or miscarriage of justice, so concurrent findings on liability and compensation were left undisturbed. The cheque signature attracted the Section 139 presumption of legally enforceable liability, and the accused's explanation of delivery to a third party did not rebut it. Service of notice was treated as valid because it was sent to the address used in court records, and subsequent service of summons supported compliance. The revision therefore failed, and the conviction, notice finding, and compensation sentence were maintained. en-us Mon, 08 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Sep 2021 18:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404958 In a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, revisional interference is limited to jurisdictional error, perversity, gross illegality, or miscarriage of justice, so concurrent findings on liability and compensation were left undisturbed. The cheque signature attracted the Section 139 presumption of legally enforceable liability, and the accused's explanation of delivery to a third party did not rebut it. Service of notice was treated as valid because it was sent to the address used in court records, and subsequent service of summons supported compliance. The revision therefore failed, and the conviction, notice finding, and compensation sentence were maintained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 08 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404958