<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1941 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293914</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to restrict the addition to 12.5% of the bogus purchases under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act. The appeals on charging interest under Sections 234B, 234C, and 234D were dismissed as mandatory. The challenge against the initiation of penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) was deemed premature. Both the assessee and revenue appeals were dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 08:45:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638351" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1941 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293914</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to restrict the addition to 12.5% of the bogus purchases under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act. The appeals on charging interest under Sections 234B, 234C, and 234D were dismissed as mandatory. The challenge against the initiation of penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) was deemed premature. Both the assessee and revenue appeals were dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>