<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (8) TMI 11 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24836</link>
    <description>The court found that the sale of the suit property was a fraud on the Revenue, executed to avoid tax liabilities. The sale deeds were deemed void under section 281 of the Income-tax Act. The plaintiffs, former partners of the transferor, were aware of the tax proceedings and failed to prove ignorance. The court dismissed all three suits, denying the plaintiffs any relief and upholding the lower court&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:39:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (8) TMI 11 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24836</link>
      <description>The court found that the sale of the suit property was a fraud on the Revenue, executed to avoid tax liabilities. The sale deeds were deemed void under section 281 of the Income-tax Act. The plaintiffs, former partners of the transferor, were aware of the tax proceedings and failed to prove ignorance. The court dismissed all three suits, denying the plaintiffs any relief and upholding the lower court&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>