<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1796 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293898</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to restrict the net addition on account of bogus purchases to 7.5% of total purchases, dismissing the appeal filed by the assessee. The Tribunal found that the assessee availed hawala entries and followed precedent in limiting the addition. The decision was pronounced on 7th Dec, 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2021 19:21:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1796 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293898</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to restrict the net addition on account of bogus purchases to 7.5% of total purchases, dismissing the appeal filed by the assessee. The Tribunal found that the assessee availed hawala entries and followed precedent in limiting the addition. The decision was pronounced on 7th Dec, 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293898</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>