<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1557 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293897</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the reopening of the assessment under section 147, finding the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer justified. Regarding the addition of alleged bogus purchases, the Tribunal limited the addition to 2% of the purchases, considering the appellant&#039;s consistent Gross Profit ratio and supporting documentation. The Tribunal disagreed with the CIT(A)&#039;s restriction to 12.5% and partially allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, directing the addition to be restricted to 2% of the alleged bogus purchases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2021 19:21:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1557 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293897</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the reopening of the assessment under section 147, finding the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer justified. Regarding the addition of alleged bogus purchases, the Tribunal limited the addition to 2% of the purchases, considering the appellant&#039;s consistent Gross Profit ratio and supporting documentation. The Tribunal disagreed with the CIT(A)&#039;s restriction to 12.5% and partially allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, directing the addition to be restricted to 2% of the alleged bogus purchases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>