https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293908 A shareholder could not enforce allotment of a company flat through a civil suit where the claim concerned internal management and property allocation, which falls within the oppression and mismanagement framework under the Companies Act, 2013; the special remedy before the NCLT/NCLAT excluded civil court jurisdiction. An alleged family arrangement or board resolution created no enforceable right because it was neither pleaded nor proved to form part of the company's constitutional documents, and no basis was shown to disregard corporate personality. The email relied on did not form a concluded contract because acceptance was conditional, not absolute and unqualified under the Contract Act. The suit was dismissed with costs. en-us Sat, 21 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Mar 2021 19:21:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293908 A shareholder could not enforce allotment of a company flat through a civil suit where the claim concerned internal management and property allocation, which falls within the oppression and mismanagement framework under the Companies Act, 2013; the special remedy before the NCLT/NCLAT excluded civil court jurisdiction. An alleged family arrangement or board resolution created no enforceable right because it was neither pleaded nor proved to form part of the company's constitutional documents, and no basis was shown to disregard corporate personality. The email relied on did not form a concluded contract because acceptance was conditional, not absolute and unqualified under the Contract Act. The suit was dismissed with costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Sat, 21 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293908