https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293896 The court interpreted Section 6 and Section 54F, with conflicting tribunal decisions. The petitioner sought TDS benefit of Rs. 2.04 crores and a stay on coercive Revenue actions. The court granted a stay on coercive measures, subject to specified deposits and property restrictions. Procedural directions included filing counter and rejoinder affidavits within set timelines. The case was scheduled for the next hearing on 7th March 2012. en-us Thu, 01 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Mar 2021 14:46:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293896 The court interpreted Section 6 and Section 54F, with conflicting tribunal decisions. The petitioner sought TDS benefit of Rs. 2.04 crores and a stay on coercive Revenue actions. The court granted a stay on coercive measures, subject to specified deposits and property restrictions. Procedural directions included filing counter and rejoinder affidavits within set timelines. The case was scheduled for the next hearing on 7th March 2012. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 01 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293896