<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>NCLT admits Section 9 application: Ex-employees&#039; salary arrears claim valid within limitation period due to MD&#039;s acknowledgment.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57051</link>
    <description>CIRP - Former Employees claiming arrears of salary - Period of limitation - at least to the extent of an acknowledgement made by the then Managing Director of the Corporate Debtor, the arrears of salary due for a period of at least 3 years prior to 30.09.2014 would certainly be within limitation, and therefore payable to the Appellant. This being the case, it is clear that the NCLT judgment is correct in admitting the Section 9 application by the Appellant. Mr. Rai correctly points out that the Employees Provident Fund letter dated 13.04.2016 was only a red-herring, and has nothing to do with the arrears of salary which had to be paid. - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2021 09:30:06 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2021 09:30:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638319" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>NCLT admits Section 9 application: Ex-employees&#039; salary arrears claim valid within limitation period due to MD&#039;s acknowledgment.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57051</link>
      <description>CIRP - Former Employees claiming arrears of salary - Period of limitation - at least to the extent of an acknowledgement made by the then Managing Director of the Corporate Debtor, the arrears of salary due for a period of at least 3 years prior to 30.09.2014 would certainly be within limitation, and therefore payable to the Appellant. This being the case, it is clear that the NCLT judgment is correct in admitting the Section 9 application by the Appellant. Mr. Rai correctly points out that the Employees Provident Fund letter dated 13.04.2016 was only a red-herring, and has nothing to do with the arrears of salary which had to be paid. - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2021 09:30:06 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>