<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 279 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404951</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Wilful Defaulter notice, affirming Directors&#039; liability as guarantors despite the moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC. The judgment clarified the scope of immunity for Directors and the application of RBI guidelines in cases of Wilful Defaulters during CIRP.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2021 09:29:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 279 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404951</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Wilful Defaulter notice, affirming Directors&#039; liability as guarantors despite the moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC. The judgment clarified the scope of immunity for Directors and the application of RBI guidelines in cases of Wilful Defaulters during CIRP.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>