<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 278 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404950</link>
    <description>A purchaser of property was treated as protected from the vendor&#039;s sales tax arrears where the purchase was made for adequate consideration, without notice of the arrears, and not from the defaulting assessee itself. The property had been offered as security under Form XIX-B for a limited sum under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, so the Department&#039;s claim could not extend beyond the secured amount. Section 24-A protected the purchaser on these facts, and the cited precedents were distinguished. The practical effect was that liability was confined to the mortgage security amount, after which the property stood free from encumbrance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2021 09:29:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 278 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404950</link>
      <description>A purchaser of property was treated as protected from the vendor&#039;s sales tax arrears where the purchase was made for adequate consideration, without notice of the arrears, and not from the defaulting assessee itself. The property had been offered as security under Form XIX-B for a limited sum under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, so the Department&#039;s claim could not extend beyond the secured amount. Section 24-A protected the purchaser on these facts, and the cited precedents were distinguished. The practical effect was that liability was confined to the mortgage security amount, after which the property stood free from encumbrance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>