<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (7) TMI 12 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24832</link>
    <description>Commission paid in India to Indian agents did not qualify for weighted deduction because the taxpayer failed to prove that the expenditure was incurred for obtaining information about markets outside India or for export promotion. No separate accounts were maintained for the relevant commission, and the record did not support the basis for allowing 50% of the payment as deductible. The claimed deduction was therefore unavailable on the facts and evidence presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:29:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (7) TMI 12 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24832</link>
      <description>Commission paid in India to Indian agents did not qualify for weighted deduction because the taxpayer failed to prove that the expenditure was incurred for obtaining information about markets outside India or for export promotion. No separate accounts were maintained for the relevant commission, and the record did not support the basis for allowing 50% of the payment as deductible. The claimed deduction was therefore unavailable on the facts and evidence presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>