<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 255 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404927</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to condone the 84-day delay in filing the appeal and adjudicate the issue on merits, emphasizing the importance of addressing disputes on merits and ensuring procedural delays do not impede justice. The decision applied to all assessment years involved in the appeals, allowing the appeals partly for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2021 09:28:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 255 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404927</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to condone the 84-day delay in filing the appeal and adjudicate the issue on merits, emphasizing the importance of addressing disputes on merits and ensuring procedural delays do not impede justice. The decision applied to all assessment years involved in the appeals, allowing the appeals partly for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>