https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293886 A quasi-judicial order affecting rights must disclose reasons and application of mind; a non-speaking order is vulnerable because it prevents fairness to the parties and effective judicial review. The appellate authority's order was found unsustainable because it gave no reasons, did not address the rival contentions, and omitted consideration of the limitation objection. The order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded to the appellate authority for fresh consideration in accordance with law after hearing both sides. en-us Fri, 11 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 07 Mar 2021 10:23:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293886 A quasi-judicial order affecting rights must disclose reasons and application of mind; a non-speaking order is vulnerable because it prevents fairness to the parties and effective judicial review. The appellate authority's order was found unsustainable because it gave no reasons, did not address the rival contentions, and omitted consideration of the limitation objection. The order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded to the appellate authority for fresh consideration in accordance with law after hearing both sides. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 11 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293886