<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty for Wrongful CENVAT Credit Availment Removed Due to Lack of Justification u/r 15(1.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57031</link>
    <description>Penalty - wrong availment of cenvat credit - The intention as to fraud, suppression of facts, etc., are relevant for the penalty under Rule 15 (3) and hence, the Revenue has not made out any case to rope-in Rule 15 (1) which deals with a different situation altogether - there is no scope to sustain even the reduced penalty and accordingly, the same is directed to be deleted in toto. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2021 11:12:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2021 11:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty for Wrongful CENVAT Credit Availment Removed Due to Lack of Justification u/r 15(1.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57031</link>
      <description>Penalty - wrong availment of cenvat credit - The intention as to fraud, suppression of facts, etc., are relevant for the penalty under Rule 15 (3) and hence, the Revenue has not made out any case to rope-in Rule 15 (1) which deals with a different situation altogether - there is no scope to sustain even the reduced penalty and accordingly, the same is directed to be deleted in toto. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2021 11:12:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>