https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404914 The court directed the petitioner company to address discrepancies in property valuation and claimed GST liability, emphasizing the need for unencumbered properties and possession of original title deeds. The company was instructed to provide specific instructions on bridging the monetary gap, including details on property encumbrance, title deeds, and a plan to cover the GST liability. An affidavit addressing these aspects was required by a specified deadline, with further instructions for document submission under the Court Master's supervision at the next hearing scheduled for 5th March 2021. en-us Wed, 03 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Mar 2025 13:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404914 The court directed the petitioner company to address discrepancies in property valuation and claimed GST liability, emphasizing the need for unencumbered properties and possession of original title deeds. The company was instructed to provide specific instructions on bridging the monetary gap, including details on property encumbrance, title deeds, and a plan to cover the GST liability. An affidavit addressing these aspects was required by a specified deadline, with further instructions for document submission under the Court Master's supervision at the next hearing scheduled for 5th March 2021. Case-Laws GST Wed, 03 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404914