https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24819 The High Court's supervisory jurisdiction under Article 226 does not extend to correcting a Tribunal's mere error in condoning delay where the Tribunal had jurisdiction to do so. Interference is confined to jurisdictional defects, not errors of law or fact in the exercise of that power. The approach to condonation of delay is to be liberal and broad rather than pedantic. On that basis, the High Court declined to interfere with the Tribunal's order condoning delay in the revision application. en-us Wed, 22 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Sep 2013 16:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24819 The High Court's supervisory jurisdiction under Article 226 does not extend to correcting a Tribunal's mere error in condoning delay where the Tribunal had jurisdiction to do so. Interference is confined to jurisdictional defects, not errors of law or fact in the exercise of that power. The approach to condonation of delay is to be liberal and broad rather than pedantic. On that basis, the High Court declined to interfere with the Tribunal's order condoning delay in the revision application. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 22 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24819