<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 214 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404886</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellant a refund of Customs duty amounting to Rs. 9,24,35,784. The Commissioner (Appeals) had initially rejected the refund claim based on the presumption of unjust enrichment, but the Tribunal found that the appellant had not passed on the duty incidence to others. The Tribunal emphasized that the Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate and other evidence supported the appellant&#039;s position, in line with the Supreme Court precedent. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the earlier decision, affirming the appellant&#039;s entitlement to the refund without the unjust enrichment bar.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2021 11:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638163" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 214 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404886</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellant a refund of Customs duty amounting to Rs. 9,24,35,784. The Commissioner (Appeals) had initially rejected the refund claim based on the presumption of unjust enrichment, but the Tribunal found that the appellant had not passed on the duty incidence to others. The Tribunal emphasized that the Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate and other evidence supported the appellant&#039;s position, in line with the Supreme Court precedent. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the earlier decision, affirming the appellant&#039;s entitlement to the refund without the unjust enrichment bar.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404886</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>