<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 209 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404881</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demands for service tax on Repair &amp;amp; Maintenance of Roads and Business Auxiliary Services. The demand for service tax on GTA services was upheld as the appellant had already paid it. Consequently, all penalties imposed were also set aside. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside except for the confirmation of demand and interest on GTA services, which had been paid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2021 17:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 209 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404881</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demands for service tax on Repair &amp;amp; Maintenance of Roads and Business Auxiliary Services. The demand for service tax on GTA services was upheld as the appellant had already paid it. Consequently, all penalties imposed were also set aside. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside except for the confirmation of demand and interest on GTA services, which had been paid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>