https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293857 A party asserting that property standing in another's name is benami must strictly prove that the consideration came from the alleged real owner and that surrounding indicia, including possession, custody of title deeds, motive and subsequent conduct, support that case. Here, the title deed and property tax receipts stood in the first respondent's name, she gave evidence of purchase from her own means, and there was no satisfactory proof that the insolvent or his father paid the price, possessed the property, or retained the title deeds. The benami plea failed, and the insolvent was not shown to have any interest in the property. en-us Wed, 05 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Mar 2021 18:17:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293857 A party asserting that property standing in another's name is benami must strictly prove that the consideration came from the alleged real owner and that surrounding indicia, including possession, custody of title deeds, motive and subsequent conduct, support that case. Here, the title deed and property tax receipts stood in the first respondent's name, she gave evidence of purchase from her own means, and there was no satisfactory proof that the insolvent or his father paid the price, possessed the property, or retained the title deeds. The benami plea failed, and the insolvent was not shown to have any interest in the property. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293857