<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 188 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404860</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the Appeal filed by the Appellant-Revenue, ruling that the assessment proceedings were rightly quashed due to the absence of valid reasons to believe that income had escaped assessment, as mandated by the Income Tax Act. The Court found that the assessing officer failed to establish a clear link between the reasons provided and the belief of income evasion, leading to the conclusion that the reopening of the assessment was unjustified. The Court also supported the Tribunal&#039;s consideration of additional grounds raised by the Respondent-Assessee, in line with Rule 27 of the ITAT Rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 09:41:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 188 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404860</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the Appeal filed by the Appellant-Revenue, ruling that the assessment proceedings were rightly quashed due to the absence of valid reasons to believe that income had escaped assessment, as mandated by the Income Tax Act. The Court found that the assessing officer failed to establish a clear link between the reasons provided and the belief of income evasion, leading to the conclusion that the reopening of the assessment was unjustified. The Court also supported the Tribunal&#039;s consideration of additional grounds raised by the Respondent-Assessee, in line with Rule 27 of the ITAT Rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>