<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 187 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404859</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the order rejecting the miscellaneous petition and directing the Tribunal to delete conclusive observations, remand the matter for a fresh decision, and complete proceedings promptly. The Court emphasized that rectification under Section 129B(2) should be for apparent mistakes visible from the record, not for revising orders, and upheld the Judicial Member&#039;s view on rectification in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2021 11:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 187 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404859</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the order rejecting the miscellaneous petition and directing the Tribunal to delete conclusive observations, remand the matter for a fresh decision, and complete proceedings promptly. The Court emphasized that rectification under Section 129B(2) should be for apparent mistakes visible from the record, not for revising orders, and upheld the Judicial Member&#039;s view on rectification in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>