<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 173 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404845</link>
    <description>Revised assessment orders based on the clarifications dated 29.07.2004 could not be sustained where earlier decisions had already treated routers and connected equipment as computer peripherals. The Court followed those prior rulings and held that the impugned revised assessments should not stand. The matter was remitted to the assessing authority for fresh consideration and orders in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 09:40:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 173 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404845</link>
      <description>Revised assessment orders based on the clarifications dated 29.07.2004 could not be sustained where earlier decisions had already treated routers and connected equipment as computer peripherals. The Court followed those prior rulings and held that the impugned revised assessments should not stand. The matter was remitted to the assessing authority for fresh consideration and orders in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>