<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (7) TMI 42 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24809</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction of expenditure on leave with wages under the Beedi and Cigar Workers (Conditions of Employment) Act, 1966 raised a question of law arising from the Tribunal&#039;s order. Applying the statutory test under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Court found that the reference threshold was satisfied. It therefore directed the Tribunal to state the case and refer the framed question, accepting the reference request in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:18:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (7) TMI 42 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24809</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction of expenditure on leave with wages under the Beedi and Cigar Workers (Conditions of Employment) Act, 1966 raised a question of law arising from the Tribunal&#039;s order. Applying the statutory test under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Court found that the reference threshold was satisfied. It therefore directed the Tribunal to state the case and refer the framed question, accepting the reference request in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>