<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 168 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404840</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s flats were sought to be attached by the Excise department for recovery of Central Excise dues related to her late husband&#039;s firms. The High Court directed the Commissioner to verify if the flats were purchased from the appellant&#039;s personal income, not inherited from her husband, emphasizing that government dues could only be recovered from inherited properties. Despite the appellant&#039;s evidence, the Commissioner upheld the encumbrance, but the Tribunal overturned this decision, ruling that the flats were purchased from the appellant&#039;s own income. The encumbrance was quashed, and the appeal was allowed, setting aside the initial order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2022 11:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638066" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 168 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404840</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s flats were sought to be attached by the Excise department for recovery of Central Excise dues related to her late husband&#039;s firms. The High Court directed the Commissioner to verify if the flats were purchased from the appellant&#039;s personal income, not inherited from her husband, emphasizing that government dues could only be recovered from inherited properties. Despite the appellant&#039;s evidence, the Commissioner upheld the encumbrance, but the Tribunal overturned this decision, ruling that the flats were purchased from the appellant&#039;s own income. The encumbrance was quashed, and the appeal was allowed, setting aside the initial order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>