<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 164 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404836</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to restrict the disallowance to 12.5% of the disputed purchases, considering only the profit element for addition. The Tribunal found no grounds for interference and dismissed the appeal, pronouncing the order on 25/02/2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 09:40:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 164 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404836</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to restrict the disallowance to 12.5% of the disputed purchases, considering only the profit element for addition. The Tribunal found no grounds for interference and dismissed the appeal, pronouncing the order on 25/02/2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>