https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293855 For enforcement of a foreign money award, territorial jurisdiction turns on the location of attachable assets or money of the judgment debtor, not on where the arbitration itself was seated or conducted. The Delhi High Court noted that the presence of an administrative office, alleged bank accounts and other movables in Delhi, together with no categorical denial of those assets, prima facie supported maintainability. It also stated that pending challenge-related proceedings in Rajasthan did not, by themselves, bar enforcement proceedings in Delhi. Final determination of territorial jurisdiction was deferred until the judgment debtor disclosed its assets. en-us Mon, 08 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Mar 2021 09:38:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293855 For enforcement of a foreign money award, territorial jurisdiction turns on the location of attachable assets or money of the judgment debtor, not on where the arbitration itself was seated or conducted. The Delhi High Court noted that the presence of an administrative office, alleged bank accounts and other movables in Delhi, together with no categorical denial of those assets, prima facie supported maintainability. It also stated that pending challenge-related proceedings in Rajasthan did not, by themselves, bar enforcement proceedings in Delhi. Final determination of territorial jurisdiction was deferred until the judgment debtor disclosed its assets. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 08 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293855