<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1794 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293840</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to restrict the disallowance under Sec.14A to the exempt income claimed by the assessee. It affirmed that Sec.14A with Rule 8D cannot be applied without exempt income, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals based on the precedent set by the Hon&#039;ble Delhi High Court. The order was pronounced on December 21, 2017, in Chennai.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 09:38:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1794 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293840</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to restrict the disallowance under Sec.14A to the exempt income claimed by the assessee. It affirmed that Sec.14A with Rule 8D cannot be applied without exempt income, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals based on the precedent set by the Hon&#039;ble Delhi High Court. The order was pronounced on December 21, 2017, in Chennai.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>