<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1859 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293848</link>
    <description>Cancellation of a mining lease cannot be sustained where the lessee&#039;s objection was not considered and the adverse decision was communicated only as a bare cancellation. An administrative or quasi-judicial order affecting civil rights must reflect application of mind, disclose reasons, and show that the affected party&#039;s reply was duly considered. A mere intimation that the lease stood cancelled, without a speaking order or proper hearing, does not satisfy natural justice or the duty attached to the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s exercise of power under the mineral concession framework. A fresh reasoned order was required after giving due opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 09:38:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638035" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1859 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293848</link>
      <description>Cancellation of a mining lease cannot be sustained where the lessee&#039;s objection was not considered and the adverse decision was communicated only as a bare cancellation. An administrative or quasi-judicial order affecting civil rights must reflect application of mind, disclose reasons, and show that the affected party&#039;s reply was duly considered. A mere intimation that the lease stood cancelled, without a speaking order or proper hearing, does not satisfy natural justice or the duty attached to the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s exercise of power under the mineral concession framework. A fresh reasoned order was required after giving due opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>