<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1500 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293846</link>
    <description>Duty was not payable on finished goods lying in stock in a 100% Export Oriented Unit where the goods had already been exported before the final debonding order. The Tribunal treated the issue as covered by earlier decisions and followed the principle that export before final debonding prevents duty liability on such stock. On that basis, the contrary view in the impugned order was found unsustainable and the appeal succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 09:38:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1500 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293846</link>
      <description>Duty was not payable on finished goods lying in stock in a 100% Export Oriented Unit where the goods had already been exported before the final debonding order. The Tribunal treated the issue as covered by earlier decisions and followed the principle that export before final debonding prevents duty liability on such stock. On that basis, the contrary view in the impugned order was found unsustainable and the appeal succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293846</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>