<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1499 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293845</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the manual segregation of scrap did not constitute manufacture. Due to the binding nature of the Board&#039;s Circular, the appellants were deemed to have correctly cleared the segregated scraps at the transaction value and appropriate classification rate. As a result, the demand was deemed invalid, the show cause notice was held not maintainable, and the appeal was allowed with consequential benefits as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 09:38:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=638032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1499 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293845</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the manual segregation of scrap did not constitute manufacture. Due to the binding nature of the Board&#039;s Circular, the appellants were deemed to have correctly cleared the segregated scraps at the transaction value and appropriate classification rate. As a result, the demand was deemed invalid, the show cause notice was held not maintainable, and the appeal was allowed with consequential benefits as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>