https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293852 A private society agreement or bye-law cannot oust a High Court's writ jurisdiction under Article 226, because that constitutional power cannot be contracted away. An alternate remedy or forum-selection clause may be relevant to the court's self-imposed restraint, but it does not create an absolute legal bar to writ relief. The High Court must consider the nature of the grievance, available remedies, and whether writ intervention is appropriate on a holistic assessment. The impugned judgment was therefore set aside and the writ petition restored for fresh consideration on merits and discretion. en-us Mon, 29 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Nov 2022 14:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293852 A private society agreement or bye-law cannot oust a High Court's writ jurisdiction under Article 226, because that constitutional power cannot be contracted away. An alternate remedy or forum-selection clause may be relevant to the court's self-imposed restraint, but it does not create an absolute legal bar to writ relief. The High Court must consider the nature of the grievance, available remedies, and whether writ intervention is appropriate on a holistic assessment. The impugned judgment was therefore set aside and the writ petition restored for fresh consideration on merits and discretion. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 29 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293852